Proposition 1 IRWM Plan Review Process
Proposition 1 IRWM funding is available for projects that are included and implemented in an adopted IRWM Plan, consistent with Water Code Section 10530 et seq. The IRWM Plan Review Process (PRP) is used to provide a systematic and consistent way for DWR to review IRWM plan content to determine consistency with the plan standards contained in the current IRWM Program Guidelines.
The 2016 PRP Review Tool, below, presents the 2016 IRWM Plan Standards and can also be found at the link in the 2016 IRWM Guidelines, Appendix A.
Note: Appendix H of the 2016 Proposition 1 Guidelines provides an overview of the changes between the 2016 and 2012 IRWM Plan Standards.
The 2016 PRP review tool is available. IRWM Regional Water Management Groups can submit IRWM Plans for review on an on-going basis. Please follow the instructions in the 2016 IRWM Guidelines, Volume 2, Section IV for plan submittal.
- 2016 IRWM Guidelines Volume 2 Section IV [For a copy of the entire 2016 IRWM Guidelines document, please contact DWR_IRWM@water.ca.gov]
- Final Plan Review Process Tool [Excel]
The current status of IRWM regions updating their plans consistent with the 2016 IRWM Plan Standards is summarized in the following table:
- 2016 IRWM Plan Update Status (updated: 04-16-2020)
As IRWM plans are submitted and reviewed, they will be posted on this page for public comment. When a draft review is posted, the public comment on that draft review is open and will close 30 calendar days later (date will be indicated). The link to the draft review will be removed after the public comment review period end date and a final review will be posted.
Notes:
- If a link to a specific IRWM Plan is not working, contact DWR_IRWM@water.ca.gov.
- For copies of Final Plan Reviews, contact: DWR_IRWM@water.ca.gov.
IRWM Plan | Plan Review | Public Comment Period End Date |
---|---|---|
Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements | ||
Eastern San Joaquin Plan | 2020 IRWMP Addendum | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements | |
Santa Cruz Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Tahoe-Sierra Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Poso Creek Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
North Sacramento Valley Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
San Luis Obispo Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
San Francisco Bay Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Pajaro River Watershed Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Kern County Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Monterey Peninsula Plan | Appendices | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Antelope Valley Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Inyo-Mono Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Santa Barbara County Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Watersheds Coalition of Ventura County Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Merced IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
San Diego IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Lahontan IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
North Coast IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
South Orange County WMA | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority OWOW Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Southern Sierra IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Madera IRWM Plan | Appendices | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Westside Sacramento IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
East Contra Costa Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Fremont Basin Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Coachella Valley Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Westside - San Joaquin | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Kings Basin Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Mokelumne/Amador/Calaveras (MAC) | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
American River Basin IRWM Plan | Final Review |
Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
San Gorgonio IRWM Plan | Appendices | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Draft Upper Sacramento River, Lower McCloud, Pit IRWM Plan | Final Review |
Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Mojave IRWM Plan | Final Review |
Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Yuba County | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Greater Monterey County IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Tule River Basin IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
East Stanislaus IRWM Plan | Appendices | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Upper Santa Clara River | Updated Sections | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Upper Santa Margarita | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Upper Pit River Watershed IRWM | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Greater Los Angeles County IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Tuolumne-Stanislaus | Appendices | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Kaweah River Basin | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Yosemite-Mariposa IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Upper Feather River IRWM Plan | Final Review | Ended/plan is consistent with 2016 IRWM guideline requirements |
Anza Borrego IRWM Region | Plan Not Submitted | |
Imperial IRWM Region | Plan Not Submitted |
Electronic Mail
Transmitted comments should be emailed to: DWR_IRWM@water.ca.gov
Electronic files should be MS Word compatible or PDF.
Hard Copy via U.S. Mail
California Department of Water Resources
Division of Integrated Regional Water Management
Financial Assistance Branch
Post Office Box 942836
Sacramento, CA 94236
Attention: Ted Daum
Hard Copy via Hand Delivery
901 P Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Attention:Ted Daum
Please specify which plan review the comments address. Comments must be received by 5 p.m. on the public comment period closing date for the subject plan. Comments on the draft reviews will be posted in the Public Comments section below.
Comments on the draft reviews will be posted here.
Note: IRWM Plans and plan reviews for the Proposition 84 PRP per the 2012 Guidelines will be found on the Proposition 84 Archives page - which is currently under construction. Please check back, or contact us, for that information.