WPC 2HBEX@Z#|  (TT) S-#XxPʖQy7XP#"5@^*7DTT77T^*7*/TTTTTTTTTT//^^^Jxooxf\xx7Axfxx\xo\fxxxxf7/7NT7JTJTJ7TT//T/TTTT7A/TTxTTJP!PZ*7777BE7TTxJxJxJxJxJooJfJfJfJfJ7/7/7/7/xTxTxTxTxTxTxTxTxTxTxJxTxTxTxTxT\TxTxJxJoJoJoJfJfJfJxTxTxxTxTxTxTBT7T777TAxTf/fExTxTxTxo7oE\A\AN:*KT7JTTTTT.3}}T2T}277JJT77TT7J72t7[[[[^ee*B`^-wSTTn[Cfx`xWkRx[\[ceIfIs`Wx[rriwhe*7DTT77T^*7*/TTTTTTTTTT//^^^Jxooxf\xx7Axfxx\xo\fxxxxf7/7NT7JTJTJ7TT//T/TTTT7A/TTxTTJP!PZ7TJTT7\777JJ:T7A7xx*7TTTT!T7.T^7TB[227`K*723T}}}Jxxxxxxoffff7777xxxxxxx^xxxxxx\TJJJJJJoJJJJJ////TTTTTTT[TTTTTTTHP LaserJet IIIHPLASIII.WRSd\  P\,,,4uaP2z Ez#@X" S-#XxPʖQy7XP#Times New Roman (TT)Univers (WN)"5@^CCc}}ǗCCC}CCCC}}}}}}}}}}CCgǓ}ro7okv}ǐzCCC}c}krkrkJrr00k0rrrrFcJrooo`YcY}CC!}}}R}}zkkkkkékrkrkrkrk70707070rrrrrrrrrCokrrrorvr}}}kk}}}}}}}r}r}rr}}}}}}7zokk0kRrr}CCFRcCCNC}}Cgoo}}CQQ}Mcc}MCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMtCnnyy2}o6coonCzohbnonvyXzXshn~|yxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxCCc}}ǗCCC}CCCC}}}}}}}}}}CCgǓ}ro7okv}ǐzCCC}c}krkrkJrr00k0rrrrFcJrooo`YcY}CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC}}}}c}}cQoCc}}MM}o}}MQogÌrrrr7777Ǘvzkkkkkkkkkkk0000rrrrrrrrrrrrory.C8*,/C\  P6QP2CC,y7XxPʖQXPn (TT)y.C8*,/C\  P6QP"5@^*7DTT77T^*7*/TTTTTTTTTT//^^^Jxooxf\2| @ @ @<#| "5@^5Footnote textFootnote text! X` hp#/d P##/x PX#Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font"11#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#toc 1toc 1#` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#toc 2toc 2$` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#2I%A&3C'QE(oGtoc 3toc 3%` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#toc 4toc 4&` hp x (#` h` h` hp x (#toc 5toc 5'` hp x (#` h` h` hp x (#toc 6toc 6(` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#2P)vI*5J+SL,qNtoc 7toc 7) toc 8toc 8*` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#toc 9toc 9+` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#index 1index 1,` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#2{V-P.R/T0Uindex 2index 2-` hp x (#` ` ` hp x (#toa headingtoa heading.` hp x (#` hp x (#captioncaption/;1#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#_Equation Caption_Equation Caption011#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#2f1OV2b W[^c@^cfooter۔D1;4 <DL!!#d\  PCP#MACNormalp2Y     X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<     :}D4P T I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)T0*ÍÍ*Í ., US $}6 @      X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<     :}D4P 0*ÍÍ*Í ., US $}6 @ "5@^;C\ccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZY}}vCM}rk}CCCcccYcYcYCcc77c7ccccJM7ccccYYcYc;;!cccRcccYYYYYY}Y}Y}Y}YC7C7C7C7ccccccccc;cYcccccrccccYYc}c}c}cccccccccccccMc}7}Rccc;;JRkM;;N;\ccCYQQcc;cccFcccFCC;;;;;;;;;;;;;CFtCnnyy2co6cQQnCzohbnonvyXzXshn~|yxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;C\ccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZY}}vCM}rk}CCCcccYcYcYCcc77c7ccccJM7ccccYYcYc;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CC;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CcccccccccQCcccFFcoc\cFcQY}}}}CCCCrcYYYYYYYYYYY7777cccccccccccccc2v@f@j@Pm^p"5@^;C\ccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZczM`zoǐCCCccccoYoYFco7Co7ocooYMCocccYcccc;;!cccRccocccccϐYYYYYM7M7M7M7occccoooo;ccocccczocccYYccccccccoocococcMo`o7Rooc;;YYoM;;N;ccCcUUcc;cccFcccFCC;;;;;;;;;;;;;CFtCnnyy2co6cUUnCzohbnonvyXzXshn~|yxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;C\ccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZczM`zoǐCCCccccoYoYFco7Co7ocooYMCocccYcccc;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CC;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CcccccccccUCcccFFcoccFcUcϐMMMMzoccccccYYYYY7777coccccccooooco"5@^#(7<^ w@~} @ @"H^^Xd ddd dddddd+ + t+dddiSdStd!XX2|6tStStStSXtS|XXtXXNX!dX  i iddXXXXXXXXXXXXXditd   (9K R(9CXd ddd dddddd+ + t+dddiSdStd+XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXddXXXXXXXXXXXXXXd d ii!i   6tttt SSSS "5@^DNkttNNNtNNNNttttttttttNNtϨZpۨ騨NNNttttggRtANAtgZNtttgttttDD'ttt`tttttttgggggZAZAZAZAttttDtttttttttggttttttttttttZpA`tDDggZDDNDttNtccttDtttRtttRNNDDDDDDDDDDDDDNRtNπ捍:t@tccCzsffzDNkttNNNtNNNNttttttttttNNtϨZpۨ騨NNNttttggRtANAtgZNtttgttttDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDNNDDDDDDDDDDDDDDNtttttttttcNtttRRtttRtct񨛛ZZZZϴttttttgggggAAAAtttttttt"5@^;C`ccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZczzzrCYozzcozzooCCCcccccYcY7cc77Y7ccccMM7cYYYMYcYc;;!cccRccczczczczczcYzYzYzYzYC7C7C7C7ccccccccc;YzccccoYczczczczcYYczczczcccccccccccccYYo7oRccc;;zMzRcM;;N;\ccCc\\cc;cccFcccFCC;;;;;;;;;;;;;CFtCnnyy2co6c\\nCzohbnonvyXzXshn~|yxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;C`ccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZczzzrCYozzcozzooCCCcccccYcY7cc77Y7ccccMM7cYYYMYcYc;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CC;;;;;;;;;;;;;;Cccccccccc\CcccFFcoc\cFc\czzzzzzzzzzCCCCozcccccccYYYYY7777ccccccccccccYc"5@^;MgccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZczMczzozzzCCCcccccYcYFco77c7occcMM7oYcYMcccc;;!cccRccccccccYYYYYM7M7M7M7occccoooo;YcccczYczccccYYccccccccooccccccMcccz7zRooc;;MRoM;;N;ccMcYYcc;cccCcccCCC;;;;;;;;;;;;;CCtCnnyy2co6cYYnCzohbnonvyXzXshn~|yxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;MgccCCCcCCCCccccccccccCCDZczMczzozzzCCCcccccYcYFco77c7occcMM7oYcYMcccc;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CC;;;;;;;;;;;;;;McccccccccYCcccCCcoccCcYcMMMMzzcccccccYYYYY7777coccccccooooYc23p4$5{ʈ @EHeadingChapter Heading3J d  ) I. ׃  SubheadingSubheading4@6  ?  A. blockquote5ӓ X"5@^DZyttϴNNNtNNNNttttttttttNNtϛZtϨϛNNNtttttgtgRtAAtAtttZZAgtgZttttDD'ttt`ttttttttףgggggZAZAZAZAttttDgttttgtttttggttttttttttttttZtttA`tDDZ`ZDDNDttZtggttDtttNtttNNNDDDDDDDDDDDDDNNtNπ捍:t@tggCzsffzDZyttϴNNNtNNNNttttttttttNNtϛZtϨϛNNNtttttgtgRtAAtAtttZZAgtgZttttDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDNNDDDDDDDDDDDDDDZtttttttttgNtttNNtttNtgtכZZZZϨtttttttgggggAAAAtttttttgt2`R?xxx,Xx6X@DQX@z-f81,f&_ x/2QXd8C;,);X PjQXP 7C;,7VXX_ p QXdV"V(#,)ΘhV PjQhPdUdX,)~o PjQPSdX,7& _ p Q dBND,) PjQP @ND,7~_ p Q6zC;,t@ #f&_ x/2QX# y @ddd yCalifornia's Ocean Resources: An Agenda for the FutureJT$Chapter 1: Introduction  Y-,T$&)\+- 0d247l9;>t@ ,T$&)\+- 0d247l9;>t@The Resources Agency of California)H#X PjQ;XP# 1#f&_ x/2QX#уJT$July 1995 (Draft) X   X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:t@ lT$y X ddd y lT$ lT$ lT$ VCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION lT$ lT$X ---o Y3X S$s X BEX@X  c<lT$<# P7P#  a< y dddj yCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION  Y-#X PjQ;XP#  U<  California is blessed with spectacular ocean resources along its entire 1,100 mile coast. The ocean  U<serves as a source of food, recreation, and energy resources, and provides a critical transportation link between California and other states and nations. As California moves toward the 21st century, its rapid population growth, cultural diversity, and growing economic base will continue to place demands on the State's ocean and coastal resources, making management of these resources increasingly complex.  Uf < A complicated system of laws, regulations, and specific designations have been developed over time to protect and manage these ocean resources, although such measures were developed without the  X! <assistance of a comprehensive planning and management approach. California's Ocean  X <Resources: An Agenda for the Future helps provide this assistance; it describes California's ocean ecosystem, identifies the contribution of selected oceandependent industries to the California economy, summarizes the statutes and agency management roles that relate to ocean management, and identifies a mission and four goals for the State to pursue. The Agenda also analyzes 11 major ocean management issues, offers specific recommendations for addressing these issues, and provides an approach for the Governor, the Legislature, government agencies, industry, and the  U<public to use in improving the management of California's precious ocean and coastal resources.   aA< # P7P#MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN OCEAN GOVERNANCE #Xx P7;XP# Government and academia have attempted over the years to initiate comprehensive management approaches for maintaining, enhancing, or using California's ocean resources. During each of these efforts, advancements have been made in the way the State approaches a wide variety of complicated ocean management issues. However, like the management of any natural resource, ocean management must evolve with the changing needs of society, new developments in technology, and improved information regarding marine biological systems and the impact of human activities on  Y-those systems. California's Ocean Resources: An Agenda for the Future (Agenda) is a result of the Legislature and Governor recognizing that California must reevaluate past initiatives and develop new goals and strategies for managing its precious ocean resources. Although California has been involved in issue specific ocean management activities for over 100  Y9"-years, efforts to establish comprehensive management regimes really began in the last 30 years. This Agenda builds on these previous planning, coordination, and research efforts. Some of the major developments in California's efforts to manage its ocean resources include:  Y%-P1964xThe "Governor's Conference on California and the World Ocean," held in Los Angeles to discuss the emerging issues surrounding ocean management. T$ X(-s*s*(3S$jBEX@X  Y-P1965xThe first Governor's Advisory Commission on Ocean Resources (GACOR I), formed to advise the Governor and Legislature on developing State approaches to managing ocean resources.T$  Y-P1965xThe comprehensive report titled, "California and the Use of the Ocean," prepared by the University of California's Institute of Marine Resources (IMR). In preparing the report, the IMR assembled a team of experts to identify, evaluate, and make recommendations on methods to address wideranging technical ocean management issues.T$  Y1-P1966xThe Resources Agency Committee on Ocean Resources (RACOR), established as a working committee. The Committee produced the 1966 report titled, "California and the Ocean," to provide the first state agency approach to coordinating ocean management activities.T$  Y -P1967xWith a change in administration, the new Governor reappointed the Governor's Advisory Committee on Ocean Resources (known as GACOR II).T$  Yy-P1967xThe Marine Resources Conservation and Development Act, passed by the State Legislature, which required the Governor to prepare a Comprehensive Ocean Area Plan (COAP). The Act also mandated creation of the California Advisory Commission on Marine and Coastal Resources (CMC), superseding the GACOR II.T$  Y-P1969xThe Department of Navigation and Ocean Development, established and given the responsibility to produce the COAP.T$  Y-P1972xThe COAP, which provided valuable information regarding the status of California's coastal and ocean resources, made recommendations for their management.T$  Y|-P1972xProposition 20, which created the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission. The California ocean area planning process was transferred to this Commission and used to help guide early management activities. The CMC was disbanded.T$  Y -P1973xThe Marine Resources Conservation and Development Act of 1967, repealed by the Legislature.T$  Y-P1975xThe "California Coastal Plan," published by the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, which provided much of the policy basis for the subsequent passage of the California Coastal Act.T$  Y#-P1976xThe California Coastal Act of 1976, passed by the State Legislature, which created the California Coastal Commission.T$  Y:&-P1978xThe California Coastal Management Program, previously certified by the federal Office of Coastal Zone Management pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act, was activated after an unsuccessful legal challenge by the Western Oil and Gas Association.T$ "(-s*s*'"Ԍ Y-P1982xThe Asilomar Ocean Study Conference in Pacific Grove, which assembled key government, public, and private interests to evaluate and recommend future options for ocean management.T$  Y-P1988xThe Resources Agency of California sponsored a workshop with State agencies and departments in response to legislation (AB 4336, Chapter 1079, Stats.1988) to discuss oceanrelated management responsibilities and planning activities. The workshop and resulting report were intended to facilitate efficiency and coordination between State agencies in statewide ocean planning and activities.T$  Y -P1989xAB 2000 (The California Ocean Resources Management Act, Chapter 1215, Stats.1989), which required the Secretary for Environmental Affairs to prepare a report on ocean management in California. The funding for this effort was discontinued and the report never completed.T$  Y -P1991xAB 205 (Chapter 1027, Stats.1991), which amended the requirements of AB 2000 and  Y-mandated the creation of an ocean resources management report and plan. Responsibility for creating the plan and taking the lead on ocean resource management issues was  Yb-transferred to the Secretary for Resources. California's Ocean Resources: An Agenda for  YM-the Future has been prepared to comply with these requirements and to guide the California Ocean Resources Management Program.T$  Y -P1993xThe Resources Agency of California received funding, hired staff, and began developing  Y-California's Ocean Resources: An Agenda for the Future.T$  Y-P1995xThe Resources Agency of California releases California's Ocean Resources: An Agenda  Y-for the Future (Draft) for review and comment.T$  ao< # PjQP#CALIFORNIA OCEAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACT  Yy-#Xx PE37;XP# Development of this Agenda is the most recent effort to improve the management of California's ocean resources. The following provides a brief summary of the California Ocean Resources Management Act which mandates the creation of this document.  X - Legislative Purpose  Y!- The Legislature declared that it is the policy of the State of California to:  Y#-P/Xddevelop and maintain an ocean resources planning and management program to promote and ensure coordinated management of federal and State resources, and to ensure coordination with adjacent states;T$  YN'-,P/,densure effective participation in federal planning and management of ocean resources and uses which may affect this State; and T$ ,PT$" )-s*s*'"  Y-P/Xdcoordinate state agency management of ocean resources with local government management of coastal zone uses and resources above the mean high tide line.T$ The Legislature also declared that the purpose of the California Ocean Resources Management Program is to ensure the conservation and development of ocean resources through coordination of ocean resources planning and management. To assist in this coordination, the State is authorized to participate with the states of Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington in a joint liaison program with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.  X1- Legislative Findings  Y - The Legislature found that the Pacific Ocean and its resources are important to the people of California and the nation. The Legislature also found that there are increased challenges to managing and benefiting from California's ocean resources as a result of new developments in technology, the establishment of new offshore jurisdictions (exclusive economic zone and territorial sea), the need to resolve conflicting demands on ocean resources, and the need to approach these issues in an informed and balanced manner. The findings emphasize the need to develop a framework of statewide management responsibilities and objectives in cooperation with appropriate federal, State, and local agencies to guide the protection, conservation, and development of ocean resources. In addition, the Legislature found and declared that it is the policy of the State of California to assess the longterm values and benefits of conserving and developing ocean resources and uses, with the objective of restoring and maintaining ocean ecosystem health through proper management of resources.  X- Ocean Program Delegation  Y- The 1991 amendments to the California Ocean Resources Management Act (CORMA) transferred responsibility for all nonstatutory marine and coastal resource management programs to the Secretary for Resources. Duties and responsibilities transferred include all executive branch delegations regarding review and coordination of federal outer continental shelf (OCS) oil and gas lease sales and development projects; policy coordination of resources management and uses in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ); State representation on the Coastal States Organization and the Department of the Interior's OCS Policy Committee; and any other involvements in marine and coastal resource matters. The CORMA also requires that adequate staff support be made available through the Resources Agency to administer these programs. While the authority for a majority of ocean management issues rests with the Resources Agency, the California Environmental Protection Agency oversees development of ocean water quality standards and regulation of waste discharges to the marine environment.  X#- Report and Plan Requirements  YQ%- The CORMA requires the Resources Agency to prepare an ocean resources report regarding existing  Y:&-ocean resources management activities and impacts, and a plan to increase coordination and minimize duplication of ocean resources management activities. The Plan shall:  Y(-,P/,dinventory and analyze State and federal laws, rules, regulations, authorities and programs T$"(-s*s*'" ,P,dwhich pertain to the resources, uses, and ecosystem health of State and federal waters, and especially those that conflict with one another;T$  Y-,P/,didentify existing and potential resources and uses of, and issues pertaining to, the ocean, and potential new industries or jobs that would be related to use or development of these resources;T$  Y_-P /Xdidentify potential impacts of ocean activities on State or federal waters and on coastal areas above the mean high tide line, including an evaluation of the State's ability to manage those impacts;T$  Y -,P/,didentify all existing State and federal programs relating to pollution research and monitoring, including general research on the ocean ecosystem; andT$  Y -,P/,devaluate management tools, such as the use of computerized mapping of existing conditions, uses, and resources in State and federal waters. T$ The CORMA also requires the Resources Agency to:  YK-,P/,ddevelop longterm plans for the conservation and management of ocean resources and uses;T$  Y-,P/,ddevelop plans for the management of California's interests in federal waters, including recommendations to develop or improve state agency programs relating to the management of ocean resources, and identifying issues which may affect local government coastal programs;T$  Y-,P/,dimprove the role of the State as a leader in programs for marine education, research, training, and management;T$  Y|-,P/,dmake recommendations for Statesupported marine research; andT$  YN-,P/,daddress methods for cooperating with other states, the federal government, other nations, and private organizations involved in marine science activities. T$ Other requirements include identifying options for ensuring appropriate public infrastructure investment to support present and future ocean industries; identifying alternative dispute management and resolution processes for resource conflicts in and between State and federal jurisdictions, and a proposed framework for managing future conflicts; identifying alternatives for joint management activities and revenue sharing in State and federal waters; and making recommendations for implementing legislation, if any.  aQ%< # PjQP#OCEAN PLANNING PROCESS #X PjQ;XP# The CORMA contains extensive findings regarding the value of, and the need to effectively manage, California's ocean resources. Mandatory requirements of the CORMA emphasize interagency coordination and cooperation in developing a comprehensive approach to ocean management.")-s*s*'"Ԍ  X- State Interagency Ocean Advisory Committee The State Interagency Ocean Advisory Committee was created to help the Resources Agency evaluate major policy issues and to help develop this Agenda. Agencies represented on the committee have assisted by providing much of the technical data, writing sections, and reviewing drafts. The committee includes representatives from the following state agencies:  XH< P/dResources Agency of California  Pdx California Coastal Commission Pdx Department of Boating and Waterways Pdx Department of Conservation Pdx Department of Fish and Game Pdx Department of Parks and Recreation Pdx Department of Water Resources Pdx Energy Resources, Conservation and Development Commission Pdx Office of Oil Spill Prevention and Response Pdx San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Pdx State Coastal Conservancy Pdx State Lands Commission  X < P/dCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency  Pdx State Water Resources Control Board  X< P/XdOther Agencies T$ ,Pdx California Business, Transportation, and Housing AgencyT$ ,Pdx California Research BureauT$ Pdx California Trade and Commerce Agency ,Pdx Office of the Attorney GeneralT$  XW- California Ocean Resources Agenda Development Development of this Agenda has followed a systematic process, consisting of six phases.  Y< Phase 1 Workplan Development. A draft workplan was developed and distributed to federal, State, and local agencies, the public, and various ocean industry representatives for review and comment. On April 28, 1993, after thorough review and consideration of the comments received, the workplan was finalized and distributed.  Y#< Phase 2 Issue Summary Development and Public Outreach. A detailed issue analysis was developed in 1993 titled, "Summary of Issues for the Development of the California Ocean Resources Management Plan." This document included a summary and discussion of ocean management issues facing the State of California now and in the reasonably foreseeable future. Each issue discussion included a set of potential policy options intended to focus comments and discussion on possible ocean management strategies. Widely distributed, this document was used as a focus for discussions at public workshops held in November of 1993 in San Diego, Long Beach, Santa")-s*s*'" Barbara, Monterey, Fort Bragg, and Sausalito. In addition, the Assembly Select Committee on Marine Resources held an oversight hearing at Scripps Institution of Oceanography which included a full day of public testimony. The Resources Agency also presented the planning approach to the Joint Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture, the Ocean Subcommittee of the Western Legislative Conference, the Marine Board of the National Research Council, and the International Ocean Governance Study Group (includes representatives of international, national, state, and local government, industry groups, nonprofit agencies, and academia).  YH< Phase 3 Evaluation of Comments. The third phase of Agenda development was to evaluate the verbal and over 100 sets of written comments resulting from the workshops, legislative hearings, and other presentations. The verbal and written comments have provided invaluable information.  Y < Phase 4 Draft Publication and Review. The fourth phase of the planning process is the publication of a draft Agenda. Public meetings are planned in 1995 to receive verbal and written comments.  X - ,PT$  Y <Phase 5 Final Publication. Based on the verbal and written comments received, the Agenda will be revised and submitted to the Legislature and Governor.  Yn< Phase 6 Agenda Implementation. Upon publication of the final Agenda, administrative, legislative, or partnership approaches will be used, as appropriate, to implement the specific recommendations outlined. Identified goals for California's Ocean Resources Management Program are applied to the ocean resource issue analyses of Chapter 5 in making the specific recommendations. The Agenda itself is advisory only and not enforceable; implementation must occur through administrative action, Executive Order, or legislation. Administrative actions are already being used to pursue several of the identified goals. Examples include creating a marine geographic information system for the California coast, beginning with a one year pilot study in the Monterey Bay Area; evaluating the State's marine research goals using the Resources Agency Sea Grant Advisory Panel; and improving decisionmaking through new approaches, such as the integrated coastal management process being used to produce the Monterey Bay Water Quality Protection Plan.  a< # PjQP#MOVING FORWARD IN OCEAN MANAGEMENT #X PjQ;XP# California has been pursuing the goal of comprehensive management in one form or another since 1964. However, these efforts have been marked by a series of starts and stops which have precluded the establishment of a comprehensive management system. Each effort has produced recommendations for improved approaches to a variety of ocean management issues; some have been implemented, others have not. In the absence of a comprehensive system, California has most often responded by creating new legislative or administrative approaches to address individual management issues. This Agenda addresses the larger picture by making specific recommendations for achieving four ocean management goals and by recommending a process to facilitate more efficient and effective coordination of California's efforts to manage the resources which lie off it's coastline.  X=(- "=(-s*s*$'"  X-California Ocean Resources Management Program The Resources Agency is charged by the Legislature and Governor in the CORMA to develop a strategy which addresses both shortterm and longterm management of California's ocean resources. The legislative declarations within the CORMA and the testimony, written comments, and many discussions regarding the development of this Agenda were used to establish a mission statement and appropriate goals for the California Ocean Resources Management Program.  YH< Mission.  To ensure comprehensive and coordinated management, conservation and enhancement of California's ocean resources for their intrinsic value and for the benefit of current and future  W -generations.   Y <Goals.  Four goals have been established to guide the California Ocean Resources Management Program in realizing the above mission.  W -,PGoal 1: Stewardship. To assess, conserve, and manage California's ocean resources and the  W-ecosystem that supports those resources.T$ ,P,dFor the purposes of this Agenda, four major resource zones are identified in California's ocean ecosystem which sustain California's ocean and coastal resources. At least 11 major management issues arise in sustaining these resources in the shortterm (up to 5 years) and longterm (up to 20 years). Effective management requires development of a comprehensive inventory of resources, habitats, and other features that make up the ocean ecosystem.T$  W-,PGoal 2: Economic Sustainability. To encourage environmentally sound, sustainable, and  W-economically beneficial ocean resource development activities.T$ ,P,dSeven major oceandependent industries in California have been evaluated to determine their economic contribution to the State and regional economies. This information is critical for placing the economic uses of ocean resources in the proper context with regard to stewardship responsibilities.T$  W(-,PGoal 3: Research, Education and Technology. To advance research, educational programs, and  W-technology developments to meet future needs and uses of the ocean.T$ ,P,dThere is a multitude of research initiatives, education programs, and new technology developments relating to California's ocean resources. However, there is a need for developing comprehensive inventories of such initiatives, programs, and technologies to identify the State's most important priorities.T$  Wp$-,PGoal 4: Jurisdiction and Ownership. To maximize California's interests within State Tidelands,  WY%-the Territorial Sea, and the Exclusive Economic Zone.T$ ,PT$ ,P,dThere are numerous local, State, and federal entities with ownership of, or jurisdiction over, ocean resources in California. A comprehensive management approach is needed to address crossjurisdictional management issues affecting California's ocean and coastal waters.T$"( -s*s*'"ԌThese goals could be achieved through a mix of government, private sector, or public/private partnership arrangements, but in all cases, can only be achieved through cooperative efforts and understanding among the diverse group of stakeholders in ocean resource management. The mission statement and goals provide a foundation and direction for ocean resource management in California over the next 5 to 20 years. The goals are consistent with existing law and policy, but provide a more comprehensive approach and vision regarding the future of our ocean. The analyses in this report evaluate many, but certainly not all, ocean management issues facing California and provide recommendations to help achieve the stated goals. Given the scope and funding of this effort, it is not possible to identify and discuss all of California's ocean management issues in the context of a single plan. However, this Agenda does focus on many of the most critical issues. Moreover, it is structured so as to establish a process to address any ocean management issue, regardless of whether it is specifically called out here. It is critical that implementation of  * this Agenda rely on a "bottomup" approach, based as much as possible on the advice and recommendations of the interested public, private, and government parties (or "stakeholders") who work with these issues on a regular basis. The State should rely on the advice of existing government and private sector working groups as often as possible to better understand and address such complex issues as habitat protection, water pollution, oil and gas development, and port development and mitigation. However, the challenge will be to timely coordinate the findings and recommendations of these groups, integrating them with related statewide ocean management policies and goals.